YourTruths
How does it work
113

Opinions given

YourTruths

An AI Engine designed to give unbiased, real opinions of your

No yes-men. Just opinions.

Submit

Humans will look at your work too

Signal samples

60

Mediocre

Decent foundation, nothing remarkable

Poetry

The poem has a clear atmospheric intent and uses sensory details that paint a vivid cityscape. The metaphor of the moon as an unfinished thought adds a poetic twist. However, the imagery leans heavily on clichés that feel a bit generic. The line breaks are somewhat inconsistent, disrupting the flow. Overall, it’s a decent foundation but lacks strong originality or depth.

61

Mediocre

Decent foundation, nothing remarkable

Marketing plan

El plan muestra una buena comprensión del mercado local y aprovecha las plataformas digitales más relevantes. La oferta de clases gratuitas y precios escalados es una táctica eficaz para reducir la barrera de entrada. Sin embargo, la propuesta carece de análisis de competencia que podría orientar la propuesta de valor. El presupuesto de publicidad es limitado y no se detalla cómo se maximizaría el retorno en cada plataforma. Además, no se menciona una estrategia de retención que garantice la lealtad de los estudiantes. En conjunto, el proyecto tiene bases sólidas pero necesita fortalecer la planificación financiera y la diferenciación.

72

Good

Above average, but not exceptional

CV

Enrique's résumé clearly shows a breadth of experience and strong sales metrics. He consistently exceeded targets, managing a large team and closing high-value B2B deals. His fraud investigation work adds a valuable compliance edge. However, the document lacks detail on the scope of the fraud role and specific results. There are no mentions of certifications or formal training to back up his skill claims. The summary also could better connect his diverse experiences into a unified narrative.

How do we score

0–19CatastrophicFundamentally broken
20–29TerribleMajor problems; difficult to recommend
30–39Very WeakMore wrong than right
40–49WeakSome merit, but clearly below average
50–57Below AverageFunctional, but unimpressive
58–64MediocreDecent foundation, nothing remarkable
65–69Mediocre+Clearly has merit, still ordinary
70–74GoodAbove average, but not exceptional
75–79Very GoodNoticeably strong
80–84ExcellentHigh-quality and compelling
85–89OutstandingExceptional compared with alternatives
90–94ExceptionalRare quality
95–99ExtraordinaryExtremely difficult to improve
100Near-PerfectVirtually no meaningful weaknesses